vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ANAPTYSBIO, INC (ANAB) and DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($180.8M vs $108.2M, roughly 1.7× ANAPTYSBIO, INC). ANAPTYSBIO, INC runs the higher net margin — 45.8% vs 3.5%, a 42.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ANAPTYSBIO, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (151.1% vs 9.6%). ANAPTYSBIO, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($98.0M vs $-6.4M). Over the past eight quarters, ANAPTYSBIO, INC's revenue compounded faster (288.3% CAGR vs 7.7%).
AnaptysBio, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing antibody-based immunotherapies for inflammatory diseases, immuno-oncology indications, and rare disease conditions. It primarily serves the U.S. market, advancing its innovative product candidate pipeline to address unmet medical needs via rigorous research and clinical development.
Double Vision is a Malaysian production studio. Established in 1985, it has production hubs in Malaysia and Indonesia. Double Vision produces over 1,400 hours of television programming per year in various languages and genres for the regional market. It also houses international entertainment TV network, Channel [V], in its studios.
ANAB vs DV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.2M | $180.8M |
| Net Profit | $49.6M | $6.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 61.8% | 8.6% |
| Net Margin | 45.8% | 3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 151.1% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 327.8% | 171.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.64 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $180.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $108.2M | $205.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.3M | $188.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.3M | $189.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.8M | $165.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.1M | $190.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $169.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $155.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.6M | $29.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-38.6M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-39.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.8M | $23.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.9M | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-46.7M | $7.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 82.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 82.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 82.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 81.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 82.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 83.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.8% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -117.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -99.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.4% | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -75.8% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -367.5% | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 45.8% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -173.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -141.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -50.5% | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -109.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -425.3% | 4.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.64 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.52 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.34 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.28 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.63 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.14 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.71 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $238.2M | $173.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $37.2M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $364.4M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $173.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $238.2M | $259.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.8M | $200.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.3M | $216.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.6M | $174.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.1M | $310.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.6M | $362.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.8M | $338.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $37.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-29.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-44.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $364.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $353.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $335.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $422.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $483.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $493.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $427.4M | $1.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $98.0M | $4.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $98.0M | $-6.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 90.5% | -3.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.98× | 0.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $19.6M | $134.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $98.0M | $72.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-27.4M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-40.2M | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.7M | $37.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-66.7M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.1M | $54.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.3M | $35.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $98.0M | $62.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-27.4M | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-40.3M | $40.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.7M | $31.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-66.9M | $30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.1M | $48.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.4M | $28.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 90.5% | 30.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -35.9% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -180.9% | 21.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -38.7% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -155.3% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -33.7% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -194.6% | 18.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.98× | 2.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.81× | 5.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ANAB
Segment breakdown not available.
DV
| Activation | $100.5M | 56% |
| Measurement | $61.8M | 34% |
| Supply-side | $18.5M | 10% |
