vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arista Networks (ANET) and HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC (HTZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arista Networks is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.4× HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC). Arista Networks runs the higher net margin — 37.8% vs -16.6%, a 54.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Arista Networks posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 11.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Arista Networks's revenue compounded faster (26.6% CAGR vs -7.7%).
Arista Networks, Inc. is an American computer networking company headquartered in Santa Clara, California. The company designs and sells multilayer network switches to deliver software-defined networking (SDN) for large datacenter, cloud computing, high-performance computing, and high-frequency trading environments. These products include 10/25/40/50/100/200/400/800 gigabit low-latency cut-through Ethernet switches. Arista's Linux-based network operating system, Extensible Operating System (E...
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., known as Hertz, is an American car rental company based in Estero, Florida. The company operates its namesake Hertz brand, along with the brands Dollar Rent A Car, Firefly Car Rental, and Thrifty Car Rental.
ANET vs HTZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7B | $2.0B |
| Net Profit | $1.0B | $-333.0M |
| Gross Margin | 61.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 42.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 37.8% | -16.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | 11.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 24.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.80 | $-1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | $-333.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $955.8M | $-194.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $853.0M | $184.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.8M | $-294.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $813.8M | $-443.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $801.0M | $-479.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $747.9M | $-1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $665.4M | $-865.0M |
| Q1 26 | 61.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 62.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.5% | -11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.7% | -14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.8% | -29.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.4% | -62.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.4% | -20.1% |
| Q1 26 | 37.8% | -16.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.4% | -9.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.3% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.6% | -24.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.5% | -23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | -51.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.4% | -36.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.80 | $-1.06 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.74 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.67 | $0.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.70 | $-0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.64 | $-1.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.17 | $-1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.33 | $-4.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.08 | $-2.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.8B | $583.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.5B | — |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $23.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.8B | $583.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $565.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $503.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $626.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $592.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $501.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $568.0M |
| Q1 26 | $13.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.4B | $-459.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $-317.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | $-504.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1B | $-262.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $153.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2B | $681.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $21.7B | $23.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.4B | $22.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.0B | $23.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.5B | $23.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5B | $22.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $23.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.6B | $25.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 53.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $193.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $835.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $346.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $641.7M | $251.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $414.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $894.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $989.0M | $546.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $613.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $985.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 64.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 53.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.49× | 4.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.49× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ANET
| Product | $2.3B | 85% |
| Service | $397.7M | 15% |
HTZ
Segment breakdown not available.
