vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arista Networks (ANET) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stanley Black & Decker is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.5× Arista Networks). Arista Networks runs the higher net margin — 38.4% vs 1.4%, a 37.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Arista Networks posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.9% vs 0.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Arista Networks's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 0.3%).
Arista Networks, Inc. is an American computer networking company headquartered in Santa Clara, California. The company designs and sells multilayer network switches to deliver software-defined networking (SDN) for large datacenter, cloud computing, high-performance computing, and high-frequency trading environments. These products include 10/25/40/50/100/200/400/800 gigabit low-latency cut-through Ethernet switches. Arista's Linux-based network operating system, Extensible Operating System (E...
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
ANET vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $955.8M | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 41.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 38.4% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.9% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 19.3% | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.74 | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | $955.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $853.0M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.8M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $813.8M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $801.0M | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $747.9M | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $665.4M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $637.7M | $19.5M |
| Q4 25 | 62.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.6% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.2% | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.7% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.8% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 64.2% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.9% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.7% | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.4% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.0% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | 38.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.4% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.6% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.74 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.67 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.70 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.64 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.17 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.33 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.08 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.99 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.0B | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.4B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $19.4B | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $318.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $476.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.1B |
| Q4 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4B | $8.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9B | $8.9B |
| Q4 25 | $19.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.0B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.5B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.6B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6B | $23.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.69× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.3B | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.32× | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $641.7M | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $989.0M | $573.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $513.8M | $-431.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $613.3M | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $985.9M | $485.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $504.4M | $-496.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.6% | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 64.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.3% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.1% | -12.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.49× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.35× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.79× | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.29× | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.57× | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.81× | -22.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ANET
| Products | $2.1B | 84% |
| Services | $392.1M | 16% |
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
