vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ANI PHARMACEUTICALS INC (ANIP) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($271.6M vs $247.1M, roughly 1.1× ANI PHARMACEUTICALS INC). MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 18.0% vs 11.1%, a 6.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ANI PHARMACEUTICALS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.6% vs 24.5%). MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.0M vs $29.1M). Over the past eight quarters, ANI PHARMACEUTICALS INC's revenue compounded faster (34.1% CAGR vs 22.4%).
ANI Pharmaceuticals Inc is a U.S.-based specialty pharmaceutical firm that develops, manufactures and sells generic and branded prescription drugs. Its key segments cover dermatology, oncology, CNS therapies and anti-infectives, primarily serving U.S. healthcare providers, retail pharmacies and institutional medical clients.
MACOM Technology Solutions, Inc. is an American developer and producer of radio, microwave, and millimeter wave semiconductor devices and components. The company is headquartered in Lowell, Massachusetts, and in 2005 was Lowell's largest private employer. MACOM is certified to the ISO 9001 international quality standard and ISO 14001 environmental standard. The company has design centers and sales offices in North America, Europe, Asia and Australia.
ANIP vs MTSI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $247.1M | $271.6M |
| Net Profit | $27.5M | $48.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.9% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 15.9% |
| Net Margin | 11.1% | 18.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 29.6% | 24.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 367.5% | 129.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.14 | $0.64 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $271.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $247.1M | $261.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $227.8M | $252.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $211.4M | $235.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $218.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.3M | $200.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $190.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $48.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.5M | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5M | $31.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.7M | $-167.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.2M | $29.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.3M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 55.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 54.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 55.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 53.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.1% | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.7% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | -76.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.3% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.7% | 10.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.64 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.14 | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.13 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.36 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.69 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.45 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.27 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.14 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $285.6M | $768.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $540.7M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $768.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $285.6M | $786.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.6M | $735.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $217.8M | $681.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $149.8M | $656.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.0M | $581.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $521.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $540.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $505.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $436.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $418.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $403.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $405.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $455.8M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $920.8M | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $30.4M | $42.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $29.1M | $30.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.8% | 11.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.10× | 0.88× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $171.4M | $161.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.4M | $69.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.1M | $60.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $75.8M | $38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.0M | $66.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.5M | $62.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.4M | $49.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.1M | $49.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.8M | $30.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $61.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.0M | $41.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | 18.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.0% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.5% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 21.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 3.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.10× | 1.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.66× | 1.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.87× | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.23× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ANIP
| Sales Of Cortrophin Gel | $111.4M | 45% |
| Sales Of Generic Pharmaceutical Products | $100.8M | 41% |
| Sales Of ILUVIEN And YUTIQ | $19.8M | 8% |
| Sales Of Established Brands | $12.3M | 5% |
| Unapproved Products | $6.5M | 3% |
| Sales Of Royalties And Other Pharmaceutical Services | $2.7M | 1% |
MTSI
| Industrial Defense | $117.7M | 43% |
| Data Center | $85.8M | 32% |
| Telecom | $68.1M | 25% |