vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. (AOMR) and Mobile Infrastructure Corp (BEEP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($10.9M vs $8.8M, roughly 1.2× Mobile Infrastructure Corp). Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 103.9% vs -85.6%, a 189.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.4% vs -4.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.7% CAGR vs -0.4%).
Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust focused on investing in residential mortgage assets, including non-agency mortgage-backed securities, residential mortgage loans, and credit-linked real estate instruments. It serves U.S. institutional and retail investors, targeting competitive risk-adjusted returns through regular income and long-term capital growth.
China Mobile is the trade name of both China Mobile Limited and its ultimate controlling shareholder, China Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd., a Chinese state-owned telecommunications company. It provides mobile voice and multimedia services through its nationwide mobile telecommunications network across mainland China and Hong Kong. China Mobile is the largest wireless carrier in China, with 945.50 million subscribers as of June 2021. China Mobile was ranked #25 in Forbes' Global 2000 in...
AOMR vs BEEP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.9M | $8.8M |
| Net Profit | $11.3M | $-7.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 103.9% | -85.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.4% | -4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 175.2% | -650.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | $8.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.9M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | $8.8M |
| Q4 25 | $11.3M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $767.0K | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.1M | $-999.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-273.0K | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9M | $-2.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 103.9% | -85.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 112.1% | -63.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -47.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 203.5% | -47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.6% | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 345.9% | -13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.9% | -14.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 150.1% | -23.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.87 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.62 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.29 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.51 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.6M | $8.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | $198.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $267.5M | $141.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $382.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 8.51× | 1.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $41.6M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.6M | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.5M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | $11.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.8M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.1M | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.0M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.4M | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $198.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $183.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $186.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $187.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $132.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $133.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $134.5M |
| Q4 25 | $267.5M | $141.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.2M | $151.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.4M | $160.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $251.5M | $164.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.0M | $170.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.1M | $134.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.8M | $107.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $263.3M | $107.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $382.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $397.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $405.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $409.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $415.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $418.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $417.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $420.1M |
| Q4 25 | 8.51× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.37× | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.62× | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.25× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-52.5M | $-626.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -4.64× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-52.5M | $-626.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-173.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.6M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-201.7M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.1M | $227.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-212.4M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.2M | $346.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.2M | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | -4.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.83× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.81× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.12× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AOMR
Segment breakdown not available.
BEEP
| Transient Parkers | $4.5M | 52% |
| Contract Parkers | $2.4M | 28% |
| Base Rent Income | $1.2M | 14% |
| Other | $607.0K | 7% |
