vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of A. O. Smith (AOS) and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (BPYPP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $945.6M, roughly 1.9× A. O. Smith). A. O. Smith runs the higher net margin — 12.5% vs -2.6%, a 15.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, A. O. Smith posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.0% vs -25.6%).
A. O. Smith Corporation is an American manufacturer of both residential and commercial water heaters and boilers, and the largest manufacturer and marketer of water heaters in North America. It also supplies water treatment and purification products in the Asian market. The company has 27 locations worldwide, including five manufacturing facilities in North America, as well as plants in Bengaluru in India, Nanjing in China and Veldhoven in The Netherlands.
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. is a limited partnership that owns office buildings and shopping centers/shopping malls, as well as minority limited partner interests in investment funds sponsored by affiliates that invest in other types of commercial property. It is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.
AOS vs BPYPP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $945.6M | $1.8B |
| Net Profit | $118.0M | $-46.0M |
| Gross Margin | 38.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 12.5% | -2.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.0% | -25.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.0% | 94.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.85 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $945.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $912.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $942.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $963.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $912.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $902.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $118.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $125.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.2M | $-46.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $156.2M | $-789.0M |
| Q1 26 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | -2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.2% | -32.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.85 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.89 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.94 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.95 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.06 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $185.2M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $574.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $40.2B |
| Total Assets | $3.7B | $98.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.31× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $185.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $233.3M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $574.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $155.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $40.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $48.5B |
| Q1 26 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $98.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $132.6B |
| Q1 26 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
