vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of A. O. Smith (AOS) and Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. (OLLI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
A. O. Smith is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($945.6M vs $613.6M, roughly 1.5× Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc.). A. O. Smith runs the higher net margin — 12.5% vs 7.5%, a 5.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.6% vs -2.0%). A. O. Smith produced more free cash flow last quarter ($118.9M vs $-26.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.8% CAGR vs -3.9%).
A. O. Smith Corporation is an American manufacturer of both residential and commercial water heaters and boilers, and the largest manufacturer and marketer of water heaters in North America. It also supplies water treatment and purification products in the Asian market. The company has 27 locations worldwide, including five manufacturing facilities in North America, as well as plants in Bengaluru in India, Nanjing in China and Veldhoven in The Netherlands.
Ollie's Bargain Outlet is an American discount store chain. It was founded in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, in 1982 by Morton Bernstein, Mark Butler, Harry Coverman, and Oliver "Ollie" Rosenberg, the company's namesake. As of September 2025, the chain has 618 locations in 34 states. Its selection of merchandise comprises a variety of discounted items, mostly overstock or closeout merchandise that is purchased in bulk from other retailers and sold at discounted prices. Ollie's Bargain Outlet st...
AOS vs OLLI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $945.6M | $613.6M |
| Net Profit | $118.0M | $46.2M |
| Gross Margin | 38.7% | 41.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 9.0% |
| Net Margin | 12.5% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.0% | 18.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.0% | 28.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.85 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $945.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $912.5M | $613.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $942.5M | $679.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $576.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $963.9M | $667.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $912.4M | $517.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $902.6M | $578.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $508.8M |
| Q1 26 | $118.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $125.4M | $46.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.0M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.2M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.6M | $68.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.7M | $35.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.1M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $156.2M | $46.3M |
| Q1 26 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.4% | 41.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.7% | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.3% | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.9% | 40.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.1% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | 41.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.5% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.2% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.85 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.89 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.94 | $0.99 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.07 | $0.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.95 | $1.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.75 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.06 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $185.2M | $144.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $574.2M | $1.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $3.7B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.31× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $185.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.2M | $144.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.8M | $231.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.9M | $199.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.2M | $205.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.1M | $128.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.6M | $170.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $233.3M | $212.3M |
| Q1 26 | $574.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $155.0M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $912.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $925.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.2M | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $984.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1M |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.10× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $4.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $118.9M | $-26.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.6% | -4.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 5.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $647.5M | $153.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $183.1M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.4M | $80.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.6M | $28.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | $147.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $221.9M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.9M | $43.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.4M | $40.2M |
| Q1 26 | $118.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $165.5M | $-26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.6M | $54.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $123.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $191.3M | $-35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $163.4M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.5M | $13.3M |
| Q1 26 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.1% | -4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 18.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | -6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.46× | 0.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.93× | 1.32× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.92× | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.28× | 2.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | -0.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.63× | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | 0.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
