vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd (AOSL) and BIOCRYST PHARMACEUTICALS INC (BCRX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($163.8M vs $156.4M, roughly 1.0× BIOCRYST PHARMACEUTICALS INC). On growth, BIOCRYST PHARMACEUTICALS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.5% vs -0.5%). Over the past eight quarters, BIOCRYST PHARMACEUTICALS INC's revenue compounded faster (19.6% CAGR vs 0.8%).
Alpha & Omega Semiconductor Ltd designs, manufactures and markets a broad portfolio of power semiconductors, including power MOSFETs, IGBTs, analog ICs and power management modules. Its products are applied across consumer electronics, industrial equipment, automotive systems, telecom and computing segments, with sales networks covering major global markets.
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is an American pharmaceutical company headquartered in Durham, North Carolina. The company is a late stage biotech company that focuses on oral drugs for rare and serious diseases. BioCryst's antiviral drug peramivir (Rapivab) was approved by FDA in December 2014. It has also been approved in Japan, Korea, and China.
AOSL vs BCRX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $163.8M | $156.4M |
| Net Profit | $-13.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | 21.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 70.3% | 13.6% |
| Net Margin | -8.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | 7.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.46 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $163.8M | $156.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $162.3M | $406.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.5M | $159.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $176.5M | $163.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.6M | $145.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.2M | $131.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $181.9M | $117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.3M | $109.3M |
| Q1 26 | $-13.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-13.3M | $245.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-77.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.8M | $32.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.6M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | $-12.7M |
| Q1 26 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.5% | 97.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 98.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 98.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | 96.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 95.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 97.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.7% | 98.4% |
| Q1 26 | 70.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.4% | 64.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.5% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.6% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.5% | 14.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.9% | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | -8.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.2% | 60.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -43.7% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.8% | -20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.7% | -11.6% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.46 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.45 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.61 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.37 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $190.3M | $259.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $800.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $976.4M | $465.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $190.3M | $259.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $196.3M | $274.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.5M | $212.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.1M | $260.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.4M | $295.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $182.6M | $320.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.0M | $96.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.1M | $78.4M |
| Q1 26 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $800.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $818.8M | $-119.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $834.1M | $-387.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $822.3M | $-421.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $886.3M | $-451.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.6M | $-475.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $895.3M | $-468.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $891.6M | $-475.6M |
| Q1 26 | $976.4M | $465.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $514.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $446.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $457.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $480.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $490.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $491.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $472.4M |
| Q1 26 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.03× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AOSL
Segment breakdown not available.
BCRX
| ORLADEYO | $148.3M | 95% |
| Other revenues | $5.0M | 3% |
| License revenue | $3.0M | 2% |