vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd (AOSL) and Bitcoin Depot Inc. (BTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bitcoin Depot Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($162.5M vs $162.3M, roughly 1.0× ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd). Bitcoin Depot Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -8.2%, a 11.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bitcoin Depot Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.1% vs -6.3%). Bitcoin Depot Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.5M vs $-23.1M). Over the past eight quarters, ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd's revenue compounded faster (4.0% CAGR vs -4.9%).
Alpha & Omega Semiconductor Ltd designs, manufactures and markets a broad portfolio of power semiconductors, including power MOSFETs, IGBTs, analog ICs and power management modules. Its products are applied across consumer electronics, industrial equipment, automotive systems, telecom and computing segments, with sales networks covering major global markets.
Bitcoin Depot Inc. is one of the largest cryptocurrency ATM operators across North America. It provides retail consumers with accessible in-person kiosks to buy and sell Bitcoin and other leading digital assets, alongside online crypto purchase services via bank transfer. Its self-service kiosks are located in high-traffic retail spaces including grocery stores, gas stations and convenience stores.
AOSL vs BTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $162.3M | $162.5M |
| Net Profit | $-13.3M | $5.5M |
| Gross Margin | 21.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.4% | 7.3% |
| Net Margin | -8.2% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -6.3% | 20.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -101.0% | 690.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $162.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.5M | $162.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $176.5M | $172.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.6M | $164.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $181.9M | $135.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.3M | $163.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.1M | $138.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-77.1M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.8M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $-939.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.2M | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.5% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.5% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | -8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -43.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.7% | -1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.5% | -1.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.45 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.61 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.37 | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.39 | $-0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $196.3M | $59.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $67.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $818.8M | $21.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.0B | $125.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $196.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.5M | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.1M | $48.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.4M | $35.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $182.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.0M | $32.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.1M | $43.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $174.4M | $42.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.9M | $66.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $37.6M |
| Q4 25 | $818.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $834.1M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $822.3M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $886.3M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $895.3M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $891.6M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $888.9M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $125.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $109.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $89.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $87.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $97.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $90.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | 14.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.03× | 9.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.54× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.1M | $6.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-23.1M | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -14.2% | 1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.2% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-40.9M | $27.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4M | $16.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | $5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.2M | $1.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-23.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.0K | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.2M | $9.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-210.0K | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.5M | $789.0K |
| Q4 25 | -14.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.7% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AOSL
| Power Discrete | $101.0M | 62% |
| Power Ic | $58.8M | 36% |
| Packaging And Testing Services | $2.5M | 2% |
BTM
Segment breakdown not available.
