vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd (AOSL) and GRAN TIERRA ENERGY INC. (GTE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($163.8M vs $124.4M, roughly 1.3× GRAN TIERRA ENERGY INC.). ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd runs the higher net margin — -8.4% vs -113.4%, a 105.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.5% vs -15.5%). Over the past eight quarters, ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd's revenue compounded faster (0.8% CAGR vs -11.1%).

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor Ltd designs, manufactures and markets a broad portfolio of power semiconductors, including power MOSFETs, IGBTs, analog ICs and power management modules. Its products are applied across consumer electronics, industrial equipment, automotive systems, telecom and computing segments, with sales networks covering major global markets.

Gran Tierra Energy is an energy company founded by Jeffrey Scott, Dana Coffield, Max Wei, Jim Hart and Rafael Orunesu in May 2005. The company, based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, focuses on oil and gas exploration, development and production, particularly in South America. The company announced its intentions to merge with Solana Resources on 29 July 2008.

AOSL vs GTE — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
AOSL
AOSL
1.3× larger
AOSL
$163.8M
$124.4M
GTE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
AOSL
AOSL
+15.0% gap
AOSL
-0.5%
-15.5%
GTE
Higher net margin
AOSL
AOSL
105.0% more per $
AOSL
-8.4%
-113.4%
GTE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
AOSL
AOSL
Annualised
AOSL
0.8%
-11.1%
GTE

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Revenue
$163.8M
$124.4M
Net Profit
$-13.8M
$-141.1M
Gross Margin
21.1%
Operating Margin
70.3%
-142.9%
Net Margin
-8.4%
-113.4%
Revenue YoY
-0.5%
-15.5%
Net Profit YoY
-27.8%
-312.6%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.46
$-3.98

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
$163.8M
Q4 25
$162.3M
$124.4M
Q3 25
$182.5M
$149.3M
Q2 25
$176.5M
$152.5M
Q1 25
$164.6M
$170.5M
Q4 24
$173.2M
$147.3M
Q3 24
$181.9M
$151.4M
Q2 24
$161.3M
$165.6M
Net Profit
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
$-13.8M
Q4 25
$-13.3M
$-141.1M
Q3 25
$-2.1M
$-19.9M
Q2 25
$-77.1M
$-12.7M
Q1 25
$-10.8M
$-19.3M
Q4 24
$-6.6M
$-34.2M
Q3 24
$-2.5M
$1.1M
Q2 24
$-2.7M
$36.4M
Gross Margin
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
21.1%
Q4 25
21.5%
Q3 25
23.5%
Q2 25
23.4%
Q1 25
21.4%
Q4 24
23.1%
Q3 24
24.5%
Q2 24
25.7%
Operating Margin
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
70.3%
Q4 25
-8.4%
-142.9%
Q3 25
-2.5%
-20.9%
Q2 25
-6.6%
-5.3%
Q1 25
-6.5%
-9.2%
Q4 24
-3.4%
-14.9%
Q3 24
-0.1%
14.5%
Q2 24
-0.9%
16.5%
Net Margin
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
-8.4%
Q4 25
-8.2%
-113.4%
Q3 25
-1.2%
-13.4%
Q2 25
-43.7%
-8.4%
Q1 25
-6.6%
-11.3%
Q4 24
-3.8%
-23.2%
Q3 24
-1.4%
0.7%
Q2 24
-1.7%
22.0%
EPS (diluted)
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
$-0.46
Q4 25
$-0.45
$-3.98
Q3 25
$-0.07
$-0.57
Q2 25
$-2.61
$-0.36
Q1 25
$-0.37
$-0.54
Q4 24
$-0.23
$-1.10
Q3 24
$-0.09
$0.04
Q2 24
$-0.09
$1.16

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$190.3M
$82.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$4.4M
$686.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$800.2M
$228.7M
Total Assets
$976.4M
$1.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.01×
3.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
$190.3M
Q4 25
$196.3M
$82.9M
Q3 25
$223.5M
$49.1M
Q2 25
$153.1M
$61.0M
Q1 25
$169.4M
$76.6M
Q4 24
$182.6M
$103.4M
Q3 24
$176.0M
$277.6M
Q2 24
$175.1M
$115.3M
Total Debt
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
$4.4M
Q4 25
$686.5M
Q3 25
$761.8M
Q2 25
$14.9M
$772.6M
Q1 25
$726.3M
Q4 24
$722.1M
Q3 24
$718.4M
Q2 24
$26.7M
$582.1M
Stockholders' Equity
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
$800.2M
Q4 25
$818.8M
$228.7M
Q3 25
$834.1M
$366.0M
Q2 25
$822.3M
$389.8M
Q1 25
$886.3M
$393.8M
Q4 24
$902.6M
$413.6M
Q3 24
$895.3M
$420.9M
Q2 24
$891.6M
$420.9M
Total Assets
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
$976.4M
Q4 25
$1.0B
$1.6B
Q3 25
$1.0B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$1.0B
$1.7B
Q1 25
$1.1B
$1.7B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$1.7B
Q3 24
$1.1B
$1.5B
Q2 24
$1.1B
$1.4B
Debt / Equity
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
0.01×
Q4 25
3.00×
Q3 25
2.08×
Q2 25
0.02×
1.98×
Q1 25
1.84×
Q4 24
1.75×
Q3 24
1.71×
Q2 24
0.03×
1.38×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$157.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-8.1M
$157.2M
Q3 25
$10.2M
$48.1M
Q2 25
$-2.8M
$34.7M
Q1 25
$7.4M
$73.2M
Q4 24
$14.1M
$26.6M
Q3 24
$11.0M
$78.7M
Q2 24
$7.1M
$73.2M
Free Cash Flow
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-23.1M
Q3 25
$420.0K
Q2 25
$-17.2M
Q1 25
$-1.1M
Q4 24
$6.6M
Q3 24
$4.1M
Q2 24
$-210.0K
FCF Margin
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
Q4 25
-14.2%
Q3 25
0.2%
Q2 25
-9.7%
Q1 25
-0.6%
Q4 24
3.8%
Q3 24
2.3%
Q2 24
-0.1%
Capex Intensity
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
Q4 25
9.2%
Q3 25
5.4%
Q2 25
8.1%
Q1 25
5.1%
Q4 24
4.3%
Q3 24
3.8%
Q2 24
4.5%
Cash Conversion
AOSL
AOSL
GTE
GTE
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
69.42×
Q2 24
2.01×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

AOSL
AOSL

Segment breakdown not available.

GTE
GTE

Colombia Segment$89.1M72%
Other$22.9M18%
Ecuador Segment$12.5M10%

Related Comparisons