vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd (AOSL) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STAG Industrial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($224.2M vs $163.8M, roughly 1.4× ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd). STAG Industrial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.6% vs -8.4%, a 36.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, STAG Industrial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs -0.5%). Over the past eight quarters, STAG Industrial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs 0.8%).
Alpha & Omega Semiconductor Ltd designs, manufactures and markets a broad portfolio of power semiconductors, including power MOSFETs, IGBTs, analog ICs and power management modules. Its products are applied across consumer electronics, industrial equipment, automotive systems, telecom and computing segments, with sales networks covering major global markets.
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
AOSL vs STAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $163.8M | $224.2M |
| Net Profit | $-13.8M | $62.0M |
| Gross Margin | 21.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 70.3% | — |
| Net Margin | -8.4% | 27.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.46 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $163.8M | $224.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $162.3M | $220.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.5M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $176.5M | $207.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.6M | $205.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.2M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $181.9M | $190.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.3M | $189.8M |
| Q1 26 | $-13.8M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-13.3M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-77.1M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.8M | $91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.6M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | $59.8M |
| Q1 26 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 70.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | -8.4% | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.2% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -43.7% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.6% | 44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.8% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.7% | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.46 | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.45 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.61 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.37 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $190.3M | $8.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $800.2M | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $976.4M | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $190.3M | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $196.3M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.5M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.1M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.4M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $182.6M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.0M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.1M | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.9M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | $800.2M | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $818.8M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $834.1M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $822.3M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $886.3M | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.6M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $895.3M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $891.6M | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | $976.4M | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.03× | 0.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
