vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and AerSale Corp (ASLE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $90.9M, roughly 1.1× AerSale Corp). AerSale Corp runs the higher net margin — 5.9% vs -55.2%, a 61.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -4.0%). AerSale Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.8M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, AerSale Corp's revenue compounded faster (0.2% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
AerSale, Inc. is a Doral, Florida-based global supplier of aftermarket commercial jet aircraft, engines, used materials, and aeronautical engineering services to passenger and cargo airlines, government, multinational original equipment manufacturers, and independent MROs. AerSale is a member of the Aircraft Fleet Recycling Association.
AP vs ASLE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $90.9M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $5.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 7.8% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 99.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $90.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $71.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $107.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $65.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $94.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $82.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $77.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $90.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-120.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $509.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -10.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 6.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $4.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $1.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $424.4M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $640.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $907.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $376.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $522.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $424.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $417.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $415.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $406.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $455.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $451.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $449.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $452.0M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $640.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $646.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $646.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $646.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $604.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $601.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $598.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $571.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 0.01× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $9.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 10.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $-29.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-45.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $37.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $-21.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-47.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $32.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-25.0M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | -13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -72.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -27.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 13.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
ASLE
| Products | $57.8M | 64% |
| Maintenance | $23.2M | 26% |
| Leasing Arrangements | $9.9M | 11% |
