vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $72.0M, roughly 1.4× Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP runs the higher net margin — -55.2% vs -56.1%, a 0.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (52.5% vs 11.5%). Over the past eight quarters, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP's revenue compounded faster (-2.6% CAGR vs -49.5%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. is a sports and entertainment holding company that owns and operates the Atlanta Braves MLB franchise. It also manages adjacent mixed-use real estate, live events, merchandise sales, and media operations, serving fans across the U.S. Southeast and global baseball audiences.
AP vs BATRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $72.0M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-40.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -56.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 52.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 2.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $72.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $61.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $311.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $312.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $47.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $52.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $290.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $282.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-40.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-41.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $29.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-41.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $29.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -81.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -94.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -35.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | -56.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -67.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -36.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 10.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.63 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-0.64 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.47 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.66 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $135.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $709.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $519.0M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 1.37× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $135.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $99.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $96.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $244.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $110.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $100.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $121.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $709.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $738.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $759.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $703.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $699.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $617.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $640.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $600.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $519.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $526.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $560.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $522.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $486.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $524.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $530.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $512.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 1.34× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 1.17× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $26.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $-88.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $95.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $28.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-34.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-82.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $76.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $16.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-85.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-64.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -26.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 161.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -29.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -22.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 10.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.96× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | -1.18× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
BATRA
| Baseball revenue | $45.7M | 64% |
| Baseball event | $23.7M | 33% |
| Broadcasting | $2.5M | 3% |
