vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST (BDN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($127.0M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.2× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST runs the higher net margin — -38.4% vs -55.2%, a 16.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 4.5%). Over the past eight quarters, BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST's revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Brandywine Realty Trust is a Philadelphia-based real estate investment trust (REIT) that invests in office buildings in Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and Austin, Texas.
AP vs BDN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $127.0M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-48.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 1.2% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -38.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -80.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $127.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $121.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $121.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $120.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $121.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $121.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $131.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $125.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-48.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-36.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-88.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-44.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-165.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $30.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 61.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 62.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 61.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 63.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 18.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 15.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -38.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -21.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -73.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -125.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 24.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.51 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $36.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | — |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $3.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $36.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $32.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $75.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $122.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $29.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $90.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $30.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $792.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $841.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $879.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $993.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 3.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 2.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 2.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 2.23× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 2.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 1.73× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $116.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $47.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $181.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $52.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $48.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 1.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
BDN
| Rents | $120.7M | 95% |
| Third party management fees, labor reimbursement and leasing | $4.7M | 4% |
