vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and BLACKLINE, INC. (BL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BLACKLINE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($183.2M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.8× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). BLACKLINE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 2.7% vs -55.2%, a 57.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 8.1%). BLACKLINE, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($26.1M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, BLACKLINE, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
BlackLine Systems, Inc., is an American enterprise software company that develops cloud-based services designed to automate and manage the entire financial close process as well as consolidation, invoice-to-cash, and intercompany accounting. The Los Angeles–based company has 17 offices worldwide.
AP vs BL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $183.2M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $4.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 3.7% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 2.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -91.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $183.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $178.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $172.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $166.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $169.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $165.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $160.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $157.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $56.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $17.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $76.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 75.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 75.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 75.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 75.2% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 47.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 6.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $390.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $332.3M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $419.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $459.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $479.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $885.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $725.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $616.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $331.4M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $332.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $328.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $414.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $417.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $446.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $325.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $279.8M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $26.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $26.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 14.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 5.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $161.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $26.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $63.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $46.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $50.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $63.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $40.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $43.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $55.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $40.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $50.1M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 24.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 7.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 0.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.66× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
BL
| Subscription And Circulation | $173.2M | 95% |
| Technology Service | $10.0M | 5% |
