vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC (COLL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($205.4M vs $104.4M, roughly 2.0× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC runs the higher net margin — 8.3% vs -55.2%, a 63.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 11.5%). COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($122.4M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC's revenue compounded faster (19.1% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. is a specialty pharmaceutical firm focused on developing and commercializing innovative, abuse-deterrent pain management therapies. Operating primarily in the U.S. market, it offers extended-release analgesics for chronic pain patients, serving providers across primary and specialty care segments.
AP vs COLL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $205.4M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $17.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 62.5% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 29.6% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 8.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 35.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $205.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $209.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $188.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $177.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $181.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $159.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $145.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $144.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $17.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $31.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 62.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 61.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 54.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 54.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 60.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 62.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 63.1% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 29.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 32.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 34.1% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 19.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $386.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $301.7M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $386.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $285.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $222.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $197.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $120.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $271.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $318.0M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $301.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $232.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $234.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $228.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $234.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $216.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $222.2M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $123.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $122.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 59.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.25× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $327.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $123.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $55.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $67.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $61.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $122.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $78.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $54.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $84.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $67.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $61.4M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 59.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 38.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 30.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 46.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 46.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 42.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 22.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 6.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 3.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
COLL
Segment breakdown not available.
