vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and DocGo Inc. (DCGO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $74.9M, roughly 1.4× DocGo Inc.). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP runs the higher net margin — -55.2% vs -190.0%, a 134.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -38.0%). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-64.0K vs $-12.0M). Over the past eight quarters, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP's revenue compounded faster (-2.6% CAGR vs -37.5%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
DocGo Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered mobile healthcare and on-demand medical service provider. It offers a range of solutions including in-home urgent care, diagnostic testing, telehealth consultations, and corporate wellness programs, serving individual patients, health systems, enterprise clients, and public sector organizations across North America.
AP vs DCGO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $74.9M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-142.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | -139.6% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -190.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -38.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -1761.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-1.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $74.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $70.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $80.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $120.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $138.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $164.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $192.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-142.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-27.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -139.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -59.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -14.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -190.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -39.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-1.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $51.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $235.6K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $144.0M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $217.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $73.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $104.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $79.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $89.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $66.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $41.2M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $235.6K | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $249.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $12.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $15.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $17.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $47.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $52.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $60.1K |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $270.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $297.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $309.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $320.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $325.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $315.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $311.3M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $217.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $353.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $408.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $430.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $455.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $493.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $488.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $490.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $-10.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $-12.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | -16.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $29.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $9.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $36.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $-10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $-12.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $782.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $35.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-11.6M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | -16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -6.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 5.65× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
DCGO
| Transportation Services Segment | $50.2M | 67% |
| Mobile Health Services Segment | $24.8M | 33% |
