vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and ENNIS, INC. (EBF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $100.2M, roughly 1.0× ENNIS, INC.). ENNIS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 10.8% vs -55.2%, a 66.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 0.4%). ENNIS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($15.7M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, ENNIS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (1.4% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
ENNIS, INC. (ticker EBF) is a leading North American provider of printed business products and related services. Its offerings include custom business forms, pressure-sensitive labels, marketing collateral, promotional items, and branded packaging, serving clients across retail, healthcare, financial services, and small business segments.
AP vs EBF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $100.2M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $10.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.9% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 15.0% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $100.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $98.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $97.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $92.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $99.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $103.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $97.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $10.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $9.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $10.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.4% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 13.3% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.51 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.39 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $31.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $304.8M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $354.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $31.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $31.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $72.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $68.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $122.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $123.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $110.9M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $304.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $305.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $301.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $302.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $297.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $358.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $354.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $349.8M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $354.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $361.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $361.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $348.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $346.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $406.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $406.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $399.2M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $16.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $15.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 15.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $42.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $16.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $23.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $16.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $11.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $17.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 15.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 1.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 2.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
EBF
Segment breakdown not available.
