vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and Evolus, Inc. (EOLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $90.3M, roughly 1.2× Evolus, Inc.). Evolus, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.1% vs -55.2%, a 55.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evolus, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.4% vs 11.5%). Evolus, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.3M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Evolus, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (23.4% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Evolus, Inc. is a medical aesthetics company focused on developing and commercializing non-surgical cosmetic treatment solutions. Its flagship product is a prescription neuromodulator designed to reduce moderate to severe glabellar frown lines, serving licensed aesthetic healthcare providers and consumers across North America, Europe, and key Asia-Pacific regional markets.
AP vs EOLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $90.3M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $130.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 65.7% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 4.7% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 14.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 101.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $90.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $69.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $68.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $78.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $66.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $59.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $130.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-15.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-13.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 65.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 66.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 65.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 70.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 68.3% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -15.0% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -22.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -27.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -17.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -22.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $53.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $146.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $-23.1M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $225.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $53.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $43.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $61.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $67.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $87.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $85.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $93.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $97.0M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $146.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $121.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $121.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $121.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $120.6M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $-28.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $-18.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $19.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $18.4M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $225.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $219.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $228.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $213.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $232.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $229.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $233.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $226.2M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 22.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 20.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 6.26× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 6.54× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $12.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $11.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 12.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 98.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $-45.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $-10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $11.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-10.9M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | -22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -36.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -18.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 98.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
EOLS
Segment breakdown not available.
