vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and EQUITY BANCSHARES INC (EQBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $63.5M, roughly 1.6× EQUITY BANCSHARES INC). EQUITY BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 34.8% vs -55.2%, a 90.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EQUITY BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.4% vs 11.5%). EQUITY BANCSHARES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($38.1M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, EQUITY BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Houston, Texas with operations in Texas and central Oklahoma. As of December 31, 2019, the company operated 285 branches: 65 in the Houston area, including The Woodlands, Texas; 30 in South Texas, including Corpus Christi, Texas and Victoria, Texas; 75 in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex; 22 in East Texas; 29 in Central Texas, including Austin, Texas and San Antonio; 34 in West Texas, including Lubbock, Texas, Midland–Odess...
AP vs EQBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $63.5M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $22.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 41.7% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 34.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 28.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 30.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $1.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $63.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $58.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $60.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $58.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $55.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $55.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $55.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-29.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $17.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $14.1M |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 41.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -207.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 43.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -164.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 26.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 25.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-1.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $443.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $732.1M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $6.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $443.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $486.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $448.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $376.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $312.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $437.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $391.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $367.1M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $732.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $711.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $635.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $617.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $592.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $504.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $461.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $456.8M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $5.2B |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.61× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 0.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 0.80× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $51.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $38.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 60.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 20.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $88.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $28.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $73.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $23.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $38.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $65.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 44.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 112.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 35.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 27.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 19.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 4.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
EQBK
Segment breakdown not available.
