vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. (FDMT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $85.1M, roughly 1.2× 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc.). 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs -55.2%, a 78.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8508900.0% vs 11.5%). 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.5M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5412.6% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
4D Molecular Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company specializing in the research and development of targeted adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapies. Its core product candidates address unmet medical needs in ophthalmology, cardiology, and pulmonary disease segments, serving global patient populations with rare and common hard-to-treat conditions.
AP vs FDMT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $85.1M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $19.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 17.3% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 8508900.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 139.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.43 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $85.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $90.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $15.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $14.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $1.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $3.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $5.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $28.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-56.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-54.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-32.4M |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -67983.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -396373.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -383007.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -1704400.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -849120.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -136200.0% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -63195.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -364386.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -342657.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -1461433.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -699060.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -115717.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.43 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.86 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.63 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $402.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $505.7M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $566.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $402.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $305.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $293.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $321.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $424.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $501.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $541.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $525.9M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $505.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $369.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $420.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $469.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $510.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $552.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $588.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $600.6M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $566.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $424.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $473.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $515.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $560.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $604.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $620.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $629.9M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $28.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $28.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 33.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $-109.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $-46.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-43.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-47.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $-134.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-29.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-30.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $-29.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $28.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $-46.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-43.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-48.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-138.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-31.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-30.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-29.8M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | -51765.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -289620.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -345635.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -13837100.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -1038966.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -611840.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -106421.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 101.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 440.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 4507.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 378600.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 59266.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 6980.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 2535.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
FDMT
Segment breakdown not available.
