vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. (FMBH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $88.2M, roughly 1.2× FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC.). FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs -55.2%, a 82.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 3.4%). FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($124.0M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (5.0% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
First Mid Bancshares Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered regional financial services holding company. It provides full-range retail and commercial banking products, wealth management, insurance solutions, and agricultural financing, mainly serving individual consumers, small and medium-sized enterprises, and agricultural clients across multiple Midwestern states including Illinois, Missouri, and Indiana.
AP vs FMBH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $88.2M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $23.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 34.0% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 26.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 3.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 23.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $88.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $89.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $87.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $84.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $85.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $80.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $79.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $79.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $22.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $19.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $20.5M |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 34.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 33.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 29.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 33.7% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 26.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 26.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 22.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 25.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.93 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.86 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $354.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $958.7M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $8.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.37× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $354.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $958.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $932.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $894.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $870.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $846.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $858.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $813.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $798.0M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $130.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $124.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 140.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 7.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 5.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $207.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $130.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $47.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $124.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $24.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $29.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $124.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $31.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $119.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $27.6M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 140.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 54.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 140.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 39.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 34.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 2.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 6.49× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 1.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
FMBH
Segment breakdown not available.
