vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (FOLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($185.2M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.8× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 0.9% vs -55.2%, a 56.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs 11.5%). AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.0M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (29.5% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is a public American biopharmaceutical company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The company went public in 2007 under the Nasdaq trading symbol FOLD. This followed a 2006 planned offering and subsequent withdrawal, which would have established the trading symbol as AMTX Prior to their IPO, Amicus was funded by a variety of venture capital firms including Radius Ventures, Canaan Partners and New Enterprise Associates.
AP vs FOLD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $185.2M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $1.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 85.7% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 8.6% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 0.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 23.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -88.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $185.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $154.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $125.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $149.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $141.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $126.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $110.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-24.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-48.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 85.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 90.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 90.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 90.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 90.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 91.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 87.7% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -25.1% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -43.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $293.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $392.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $274.2M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $949.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 1.43× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $231.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $250.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $249.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $249.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $260.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $239.6M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $392.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $392.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $391.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $390.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $390.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $389.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $388.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $388.4M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $274.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $230.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $193.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $194.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $178.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $132.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $130.7M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $949.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $868.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $815.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $789.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $785.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $786.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $749.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $721.8M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 2.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 2.93× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 2.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $16.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $16.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 8.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $29.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-26.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $-29.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-31.5M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -28.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | -0.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
FOLD
| Other | $105.8M | 57% |
| Galafold | $64.8M | 35% |
| Pombiliti Opfolda | $14.6M | 8% |
