vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and Grindr Inc. (GRND). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Grindr Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($126.0M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.2× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). Grindr Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.1% vs -55.2%, a 71.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Grindr Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.0% vs 11.5%). Grindr Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($24.5M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Grindr Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.3% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Grindr is a location-based social networking and online hookup application for LGBTQ people.
AP vs GRND — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $126.0M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $20.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 24.9% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 16.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 29.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 116.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $126.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $115.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $104.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $93.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $97.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $89.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $82.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $75.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $27.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-123.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-22.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-9.4M |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 39.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 23.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 31.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 29.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 25.6% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 26.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 28.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -126.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -27.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -12.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $87.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $395.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $47.0M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $531.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 8.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $87.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $120.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $255.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $59.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $39.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $16.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $21.5M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $395.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $279.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $283.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $287.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $290.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $294.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $297.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $315.0M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $187.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $319.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $-131.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $-13.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $-41.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $-22.0M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $531.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $439.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $547.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $679.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $479.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $456.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $435.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $437.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 8.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 3.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 1.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $24.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $24.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 19.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $140.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $24.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $23.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $29.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $20.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $24.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $55.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $29.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $20.3M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 30.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 26.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 0.88× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
GRND
| License And Service | $102.9M | 82% |
| Advertising | $23.1M | 18% |