vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and Hour Loop, Inc (HOUR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $56.1M, roughly 1.9× Hour Loop, Inc). Hour Loop, Inc runs the higher net margin — -1.2% vs -55.2%, a 54.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 3.0%). Hour Loop, Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.0M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Hour Loop, Inc's revenue compounded faster (50.7% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Hour Loop, Inc. is an e-commerce retail company that offers a diverse portfolio of products including home goods, apparel, toys, electronics accessories, and daily consumer essentials. It primarily operates through leading third-party online marketplaces, with its core customer base concentrated in North America, focusing on delivering affordable, high-value daily products to mass consumers.
AP vs HOUR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $56.1M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-657.3K |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.6% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | -1.5% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -1.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 57.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $33.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $27.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $54.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $28.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $24.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-657.3K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $530.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $654.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $469.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $649.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 54.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 58.6% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $7.0M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $23.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $7.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $5.5M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $23.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $31.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $19.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $20.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $16.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $3.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $3.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 5.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $2.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $500.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-901.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-23.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $456.2K | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $492.9K |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $449.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-901.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-24.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $439.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $475.1K |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | -0.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
HOUR
Segment breakdown not available.
