vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and iQSTEL Inc (IQST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $84.2M, roughly 1.2× iQSTEL Inc). iQSTEL Inc runs the higher net margin — -3.2% vs -55.2%, a 52.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -14.9%). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-64.0K vs $-1.2M). Over the past eight quarters, iQSTEL Inc's revenue compounded faster (28.0% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
iQSTEL Inc is a technology holding company operating three core segments: telecommunications, Internet of Things (IoT), and fintech. It offers connectivity services, smart IoT monitoring solutions, and digital financial tools, mainly serving small and medium-sized enterprises and retail customers in North and South American markets.
AP vs IQST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $84.2M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-2.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 3.5% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | -2.9% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -3.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -14.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.92 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $84.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $102.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $72.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $57.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $98.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $54.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $78.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $51.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-773.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-580.2K |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -1.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.82 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $2.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $4.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $16.3M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $51.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.25× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $797.2K | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $2.7M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $194.0K |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $17.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $11.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $8.4M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $51.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $46.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $51.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $42.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $79.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $22.1M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 0.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 0.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $-1.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $-1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | -1.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $-4.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $-953.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $257.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $-403.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $625.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $-536.9K |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $-969.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $211.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-421.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $594.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-608.5K |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
IQST
| USA | $53.2M | 63% |
| Other | $29.9M | 35% |
| Switzerland | $1.1M | 1% |
