vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. (KW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.6M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.2× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 48.1% vs -55.2%, a 103.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -11.0%). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-64.0K vs $-55.2M). Over the past eight quarters, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP's revenue compounded faster (-2.6% CAGR vs -6.0%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Kennedy Wilson is a real estate investment company headquartered in Beverly Hills, California, United States.
AP vs KW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $120.6M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $58.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 57.3% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 48.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -11.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $120.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $116.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $135.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $128.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $135.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $127.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $132.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $136.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-29.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $43.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-66.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-48.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $37.7M |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 57.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 36.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -60.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -45.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 47.2% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 48.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -52.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -36.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 27.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $184.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $6.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $382.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $309.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $356.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $217.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $367.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $366.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $541.9M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $-55.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | -45.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 55.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $-103.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-51.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $55.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $36.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $-5.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $-55.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $-18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-59.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-76.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-27.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-57.1M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | -45.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | -15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -56.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -41.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 97.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 37.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 1.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
KW
| Consolidated Portfolio Segment | $84.9M | 70% |
| Investment Management Fees | $30.4M | 25% |
| Real Estate | $5.1M | 4% |