vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and LIVEPERSON INC (LPSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $59.3M, roughly 1.8× LIVEPERSON INC). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP runs the higher net margin — -55.2% vs -77.8%, a 22.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -19.0%). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-64.0K vs $-12.0M). Over the past eight quarters, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP's revenue compounded faster (-2.6% CAGR vs -16.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
LivePerson is a global technology company that develops conversational commerce and AI software.
AP vs LPSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $59.3M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-46.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 73.2% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | -68.7% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -77.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -19.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 58.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-9.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $60.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $59.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $64.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $73.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $74.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $79.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-46.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-14.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-112.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-28.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $41.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-35.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 73.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 71.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 71.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 73.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 79.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 71.3% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -68.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -24.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -26.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -138.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -37.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -42.7% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -77.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -26.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -153.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -41.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-9.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-2.76 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-17.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-4.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $95.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $-44.5M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $454.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $95.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $106.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $162.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $176.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $183.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $142.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $146.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $127.1M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $512.1M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $-44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $-22.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $-82.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $-74.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $-67.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $66.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $19.2M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $454.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $511.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $604.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $596.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $607.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $692.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $703.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $724.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 26.69× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $-9.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $-12.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | -20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $-42.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-17.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $-12.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-230.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-22.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-10.4M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | -20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | -14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -28.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 13.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | -0.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
LPSN
| Hosted Services Business | $51.0M | 86% |
| Professional Services | $8.3M | 14% |