vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and MARKETWISE, INC. (MKTW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $83.4M, roughly 1.3× MARKETWISE, INC.). MARKETWISE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 2.3% vs -55.2%, a 57.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -14.4%). MARKETWISE, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($45.6M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP's revenue compounded faster (-2.6% CAGR vs -12.5%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
MarketWise Inc. is a leading provider of investment research, financial market data, and wealth management education solutions. It serves both retail and institutional investors across North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region, offering actionable market insights, portfolio analysis tools, and specialized multi-asset research.
AP vs MKTW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $83.4M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $1.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 87.0% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 15.8% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 2.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -14.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -9.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.79 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $83.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $81.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $80.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $83.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $97.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $105.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $109.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $890.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 87.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 87.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 86.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 85.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 88.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 86.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 87.7% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 18.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 20.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.87 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.80 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.85 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $70.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $-11.7M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $218.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $70.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $69.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $79.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $97.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $94.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $109.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $131.2M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $707.0K |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $-19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $-23.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $-9.4M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $218.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $201.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $211.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $239.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $259.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $278.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $315.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $359.3M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $46.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $45.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 54.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.84× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $67.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $-22.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $-18.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $45.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-22.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 54.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 1.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | -10.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | -2.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
MKTW
Segment breakdown not available.
