vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and MAXLINEAR, INC (MXL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAXLINEAR, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($137.2M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.3× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). MAXLINEAR, INC runs the higher net margin — -32.9% vs -55.2%, a 22.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MAXLINEAR, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.0% vs 11.5%). Over the past eight quarters, MAXLINEAR, INC's revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
MaxLinear, Inc. is an American electronic hardware company. Founded in 2003, it provides highly integrated radio-frequency (RF) analog and mixed-signal semiconductor products for broadband communications applications. It is a New York Stock Exchange-traded company.
AP vs MXL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $137.2M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-45.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 30.0% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -32.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 43.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -203.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $137.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $136.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $126.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $108.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $95.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $92.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $81.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $92.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-45.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-49.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-75.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-39.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 56.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -32.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -22.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -44.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -44.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | -32.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -36.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -51.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -62.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -93.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -42.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.52 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $61.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $123.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $454.2M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $771.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.27× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $72.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $111.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $108.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $102.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $118.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $148.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $185.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $123.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $454.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $464.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $488.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $493.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $516.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $556.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $617.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $771.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $796.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $808.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $863.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $855.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $864.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $895.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $973.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $10.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $-27.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-13.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-34.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-5.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -32.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
MXL
Segment breakdown not available.
