vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and N-able, Inc. (NABL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
N-able, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($130.3M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.2× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). On growth, N-able, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.8% vs 11.5%). N-able, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($20.9M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, N-able, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.0% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Able UK is a British industrial services company specialising in decommissioning of ships and offshore installations.
AP vs NABL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $130.3M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 10.2% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 11.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $131.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $131.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $116.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $116.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $119.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $113.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $7.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 76.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 80.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 84.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 83.9% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 18.0% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 6.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $111.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $393.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $804.7M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.49× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $111.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $101.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $93.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $94.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $85.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $174.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $157.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $139.2M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $393.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $331.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $332.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $332.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $333.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $333.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $334.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $334.5M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $804.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $813.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $809.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $775.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $759.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $765.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $724.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $709.1M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 0.47× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $25.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $20.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 16.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $75.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $25.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $24.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $27.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $20.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $16.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $24.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $746.0K |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 20.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 2.89× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
NABL
| Transferred Over Time | $121.9M | 94% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 6% |
| Other Revenue | $1.3M | 1% |
