vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
National Storage Affiliates Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($187.0M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.8× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). National Storage Affiliates Trust runs the higher net margin — 12.2% vs -55.2%, a 67.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -1.6%). National Storage Affiliates Trust produced more free cash flow last quarter ($299.8M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, National Storage Affiliates Trust's revenue compounded faster (-2.4% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
National Storage Affiliates Trust is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust focused on self-storage assets. It owns, operates and acquires self-storage facilities across dozens of U.S. states, offering secure storage solutions for residential and commercial customers.
AP vs NSA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $187.0M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $22.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 72.5% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 20.2% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 12.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 36.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $187.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $188.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $188.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $188.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $190.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $193.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $190.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $196.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $19.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $16.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 70.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 70.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 70.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 72.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 72.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 72.1% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 48.9% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 30.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $23.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $946.0M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $19.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $50.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $59.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $946.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $973.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $986.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $5.4B |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $338.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $299.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 160.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 20.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 14.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $541.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $338.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $100.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $79.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $85.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $363.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $105.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $83.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $299.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $79.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $344.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $101.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $79.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $88.6M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 160.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 42.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 181.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 45.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 6.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 21.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 4.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
NSA
Segment breakdown not available.
