vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and OppFi Inc. (OPFI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $85.6M, roughly 1.2× OppFi Inc.). OppFi Inc. runs the higher net margin — 19.7% vs -55.2%, a 74.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 5.9%). OppFi Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($382.2M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, OppFi Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
OppFi Inc. is a US-headquartered financial technology firm that provides responsible, accessible financial solutions including installment loans, credit-building tools and related support services to consumers underserved by traditional banking institutions, prioritizing fair terms to help users boost their long-term financial wellness.
AP vs OPFI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $85.6M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $16.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 36.1% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 19.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 5.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 400.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $1.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $85.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $104.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $100.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $90.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $80.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $91.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $86.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $63.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $16.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $41.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-20.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $5.5M |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 36.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 46.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 38.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -20.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $1.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $49.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $58.5M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $754.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $49.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $45.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $45.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $58.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $61.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $44.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $46.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $47.2M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $58.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $49.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $32.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $34.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $18.2M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $754.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $720.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $673.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $640.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $641.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $619.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $573.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $563.2M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $401.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $382.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 446.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 22.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.82× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $652.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $401.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $105.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $95.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $83.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $323.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $77.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $77.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $74.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $382.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $99.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $91.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $79.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $310.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $73.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $74.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $72.3M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 446.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 95.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 90.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 87.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 384.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 80.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 86.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 114.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.82× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 25.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
OPFI
Segment breakdown not available.
