vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $75.5M, roughly 1.4× PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.). On growth, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.7% vs 11.5%). PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (31.3% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
AP vs PBYI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $75.5M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 22.7% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 27.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $75.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $59.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $47.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $43.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 69.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 75.5% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $97.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $22.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $130.3M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $216.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.17× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $97.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $94.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $93.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $107.2M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $79.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $90.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $102.0M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $115.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $104.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $92.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $71.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $51.0M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $216.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $202.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $194.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $196.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $213.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $220.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $214.1M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 1.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 2.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $14.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $41.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
PBYI
Segment breakdown not available.