vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and PagerDuty, Inc. (PD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PagerDuty, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($124.5M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.2× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). PagerDuty, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 129.7% vs -55.2%, a 185.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 4.7%). PagerDuty, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($24.1M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, PagerDuty, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.9% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
PagerDuty, Inc. is an American cloud computing company specializing in a SaaS incident management platform for IT operations departments.
AP vs PD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $124.5M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $161.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 85.3% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 129.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 2827.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $124.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $123.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $119.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $121.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $118.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $115.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $111.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $111.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $161.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-28.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 84.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 84.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 83.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 83.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 82.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 81.7% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -19.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -30.1% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 129.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -25.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $547.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $320.5M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $547.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $567.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $597.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $570.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $542.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $599.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $592.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $571.2M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $484.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $489.5M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $320.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $180.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $145.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $129.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $111.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $164.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $174.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $891.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $926.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $927.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $866.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $916.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $924.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $925.3M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 3.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 2.85× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $24.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $24.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 19.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $117.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $24.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $31.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $28.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $22.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $24.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $30.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $21.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $21.2M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 19.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
PD
| US | $88.8M | 71% |
| Non Us | $35.7M | 29% |
