vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and Porch Group, Inc. (PRCH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Porch Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($121.1M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.2× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). Porch Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3.9% vs -55.2%, a 51.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Porch Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.0% vs 11.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Porch Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (26.4% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Porch is a website that tries to connect homeowners with local home improvement contractors. The site features advice articles, cost guide, and online booking for over 160 home projects.
AP vs PRCH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $121.1M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-4.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 34.7% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -3.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 100.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 2.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $112.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $115.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $107.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $84.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $75.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $75.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-64.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 99.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 75.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 70.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 79.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -69.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 40.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -84.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $68.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $391.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $26.3M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $806.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 14.87× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $68.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $57.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $85.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $70.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $191.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $238.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $308.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $391.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $392.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $387.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $394.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $409.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $403.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $399.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $436.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $-24.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $-27.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $-29.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $-52.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $-77.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $-101.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $806.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $797.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $787.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $770.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $802.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $814.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $867.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $876.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.87× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $35.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $40.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $35.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 33.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -35.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -34.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | -1.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | -0.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
PRCH
Segment breakdown not available.
