vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $83.1M, roughly 1.3× PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp). PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp runs the higher net margin — -38.1% vs -55.2%, a 17.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs 11.5%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp's revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
AP vs PRCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $83.1M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-31.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -38.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $79.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $58.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $53.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-25.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -40.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -50.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -38.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -48.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $245.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $51.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $347.7M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $487.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $245.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $286.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $294.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $302.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $333.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $214.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $51.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $51.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $51.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $51.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $347.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $365.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $380.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $385.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $389.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $251.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $487.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $508.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $511.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $519.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $374.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-15.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-16.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | -15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | -11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -31.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
PRCT
| Handpieces and other consumables | $43.0M | 52% |
| System sales and rentals | $23.4M | 28% |
| Other | $11.1M | 13% |
| Service | $5.6M | 7% |
