vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (RYTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $57.3M, roughly 1.8× RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP runs the higher net margin — -55.2% vs -83.0%, a 27.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (36.9% vs 11.5%). Over the past eight quarters, RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (48.5% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on developing and commercializing targeted therapies for rare genetic disorders causing severe unmanageable obesity, including POMC deficiency, LEPR deficiency, and Bardet-Biedl syndrome. It serves patients in North America and Europe who lack effective standard treatments for their chronic life-altering conditions.
AP vs RYTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $57.3M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-47.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | -82.2% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -83.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 36.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -9.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $57.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $41.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $26.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-47.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-52.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-46.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-43.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-43.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-141.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 91.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 89.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 88.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 90.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 89.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.2% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -82.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -102.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -93.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -143.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -98.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -132.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -139.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -538.7% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -83.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -103.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -96.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -151.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -103.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -131.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -110.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -544.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.82 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.55 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-2.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $388.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $139.1M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $480.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $388.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $416.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $291.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $314.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $320.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $298.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $319.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $201.2M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $139.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $148.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $39.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $61.6M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $480.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $506.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $372.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $386.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $392.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $363.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $381.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $258.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $-25.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $-25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-23.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-29.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $-40.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
RYTM
Segment breakdown not available.
