vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and SITIME Corp (SITM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SITIME Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($113.3M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.1× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). SITIME Corp runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs -55.2%, a 63.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SITIME Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (66.3% vs 11.5%). SITIME Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($13.0M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, SITIME Corp's revenue compounded faster (85.2% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
SiTime Corporation is a publicly traded fabless chipmaker based in Santa Clara, California that develops micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), used for timing devices in electronics.
AP vs SITM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $113.3M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $9.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 56.4% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 1.6% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 66.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 148.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $113.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $60.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $43.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $33.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-28.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 56.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 53.5% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -46.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -43.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -106.1% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -29.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -33.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -61.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -86.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-1.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-1.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-1.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $692.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $699.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $696.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $692.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $696.2M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $872.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $885.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $877.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $878.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $942.6M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $25.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 11.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 10.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $35.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-181.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -3.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 23.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
SITM
Segment breakdown not available.
