vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and BRAND HOUSE COLLECTIVE, INC. (TBHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $103.5M, roughly 1.0× BRAND HOUSE COLLECTIVE, INC.). BRAND HOUSE COLLECTIVE, INC. runs the higher net margin — -3.6% vs -55.2%, a 51.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -9.6%). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-64.0K vs $-26.8M). Over the past eight quarters, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP's revenue compounded faster (-2.6% CAGR vs -21.0%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Soho House is an international private members’ club with a focus on the media, arts and fashion industries.
AP vs TBHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $103.5M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-3.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 20.4% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | -1.9% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -3.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 51.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $103.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $75.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $81.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $148.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $114.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $86.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $91.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $165.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $10.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 32.0% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -26.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.59 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-1.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $6.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $-44.0M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $229.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $3.8M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $85.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $61.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $34.0M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $-44.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $-35.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $-27.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $229.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $221.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $225.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $242.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $266.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $242.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $250.6M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 10.88× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $-25.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $-26.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | -25.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $-18.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $28.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $-26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | -25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 16.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 2.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
TBHC
Segment breakdown not available.
