vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and VIEMED HEALTHCARE, INC. (VMD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $76.2M, roughly 1.4× VIEMED HEALTHCARE, INC.). VIEMED HEALTHCARE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 7.4% vs -55.2%, a 62.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, VIEMED HEALTHCARE, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs 11.5%). VIEMED HEALTHCARE, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.7M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, VIEMED HEALTHCARE, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (22.7% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Viemed Healthcare, Inc. is a medical technology firm specializing in respiratory care solutions. It develops, manufactures and distributes portable ventilators, respiratory therapy devices and related support services, catering to acute care, post-acute care and home care segments across North America, Europe and key Asia-Pacific markets for patients with respiratory conditions.
AP vs VMD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $76.2M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $5.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.9% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 11.0% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 7.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 30.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $76.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $71.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $59.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $60.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $58.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $55.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $50.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 58.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 58.9% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $13.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $141.5M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $199.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $17.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $141.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $139.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $134.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $131.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $125.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $119.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $116.3M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $199.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $202.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $184.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $178.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $177.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $169.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $163.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $154.9M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $18.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $9.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 12.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 11.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $11.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $1.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -9.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 26.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 1.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 3.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 6.94× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.73× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
VMD
Segment breakdown not available.
