vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of StoneBridge Acquisition II Corp (APAC) and ATIF Holdings Ltd (ZBAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ATIF Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($250.0K vs $19, roughly 13157.9× StoneBridge Acquisition II Corp). ATIF Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — -635.6% vs -307242.1%, a 306606.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
ATIF Holdings Ltd is a professional business advisory service provider that mainly serves small and medium-sized enterprises across the Asia-Pacific region. It offers corporate strategic consulting, fundraising guidance, cross-border expansion support, and industry resource matching services for clients in technology, consumer goods, manufacturing and other key sectors.
APAC vs ZBAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19 | $250.0K |
| Net Profit | $-58.4K | $-1.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -75.6% |
| Net Margin | -307242.1% | -635.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 25.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -96.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $19 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $250.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $200.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $270.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $200.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $125.0K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-1.2M |
| Q3 25 | $-58.4K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-807.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-407.6K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-625.5K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-3.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -75.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -175.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -260.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2190.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -525.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 103.9% |
| Q3 25 | -307242.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -635.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -951.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -403.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1630.6% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -500.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 275.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $7.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-40.9K | $8.4M |
| Total Assets | $501.1K | $8.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $139.2K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $361.2K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $736.7K |
| Q3 25 | $-40.9K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $506.3K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $913.9K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.5M |
| Q3 25 | $501.1K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $3.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $187.2K | $-939.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $187.2K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-939.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-395.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-62.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-212.8K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $195.4K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-972.8K |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-213.5K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $191.0K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-980.3K |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -854.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 152.8% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 83.1% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -0.6% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
