vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM) and BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. (BBBY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($335.5M vs $247.8M, roughly 1.4× BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.). Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. runs the higher net margin — 35.2% vs -6.6%, a 41.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 6.9%). Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($171.6M vs $-12.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.7% CAGR vs -21.1%).
Artisan Partners is an American asset management company headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Outside the United States, the company has offices in Dublin, Hong Kong, London, Singapore and Sydney.
Bed Bath & Beyond was an American big-box retail chain specializing in housewares, furniture, and specialty items. Headquartered in Union, New Jersey, the chain operated stores in the United States and Canada, and was once counted among the Fortune 500 and the Forbes Global 2000. The chain filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April 2023 and liquidated all of its remaining stores, with the last closing on July 30, 2023. Following the retail chain's liquidation, its name was adopted by online ret...
APAM vs BBBY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $335.5M | $247.8M |
| Net Profit | $118.1M | $-16.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.9% |
| Operating Margin | 39.2% | 68.8% |
| Net Margin | 35.2% | -6.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.9% | 6.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.9% | 58.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.36 | $-0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $247.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $335.5M | $273.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.3M | $257.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.7M | $282.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.1M | $231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $297.1M | $303.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $279.6M | $311.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.8M | $398.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-16.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $118.1M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.8M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.6M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.1M | $-39.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $87.5M | $-81.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.0M | $-61.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.6M | $-42.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 68.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 39.2% | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.8% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | -4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | -10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.7% | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.3% | -14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.0% | -11.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.2% | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | -1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | -17.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.5% | -26.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | -19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | -10.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.36 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.93 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.94 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.82 | $-0.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.99 | $-1.68 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.03 | $-1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.80 | $-0.93 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $135.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $190.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $438.8M | $202.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $404.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $135.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $175.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $167.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $120.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $114.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $159.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $140.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $186.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $190.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $200.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $202.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $438.8M | $217.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.1M | $202.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $381.8M | $130.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.5M | $143.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.9M | $162.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $372.1M | $196.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $341.2M | $250.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $404.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $425.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $414.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $358.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $363.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $402.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $428.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $496.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.59× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $172.0M | $-11.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.6M | $-12.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 51.2% | -5.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.46× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $420.6M | $-24.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-11.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $172.0M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.4M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.9M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.9M | $-50.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $372.8M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.8M | $-42.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.9M | $-75.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-12.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $171.6M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.4M | $-17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.9M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.7M | $-52.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $371.3M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.4M | $-45.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.2M | $-80.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 51.2% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.9% | -22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 125.0% | -8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | -14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | -20.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
