vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM) and Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fluence Energy, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($475.2M vs $335.5M, roughly 1.4× Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.). Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. runs the higher net margin — 35.2% vs -9.5%, a 44.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fluence Energy, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (154.4% vs 12.9%). Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($171.6M vs $-232.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.7% CAGR vs -12.7%).
Artisan Partners is an American asset management company headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Outside the United States, the company has offices in Dublin, Hong Kong, London, Singapore and Sydney.
Progress Energy was a power generation and distribution company. Prior to its merger with Duke Energy, it was a Fortune 500 energy company with more than 21,000 megawatts of generation capacity and $9 billion in annual revenues. Headquartered in Raleigh, North Carolina, Progress Energy includes two major electric utilities that serve approximately 3.1 million customers in the Carolinas and Florida. As an independent company, the last chairman and CEO of Progress Energy was William D. Johnson;...
APAM vs FLNC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $335.5M | $475.2M |
| Net Profit | $118.1M | $-45.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 4.9% |
| Operating Margin | 39.2% | -14.8% |
| Net Margin | 35.2% | -9.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.9% | 154.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.9% | -8.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.36 | $-0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $335.5M | $475.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.7M | $602.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.1M | $431.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $297.1M | $186.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $279.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.8M | $483.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $264.4M | $623.1M |
| Q4 25 | $118.1M | $-45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.8M | $17.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.6M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.1M | $-31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $87.5M | $-41.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.0M | $47.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.6M | $785.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.5M | $-9.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | 39.2% | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.7% | -31.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.4% | -2.3% |
| Q4 25 | 35.2% | -9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | -7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.5% | -22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.5% | -1.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.36 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.93 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.94 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.82 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.99 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.03 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.80 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.84 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $452.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $190.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $438.8M | $388.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $452.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $690.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $436.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $568.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $607.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $448.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $388.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $411.8M |
| Q4 25 | $190.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $200.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $438.8M | $388.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.1M | $429.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $381.8M | $407.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.5M | $388.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.9M | $409.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $372.1M | $472.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $341.2M | $421.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $320.3M | $413.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.62× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $172.0M | $-226.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.6M | $-232.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 51.2% | -48.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.46× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $420.6M | $-179.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $172.0M | $-226.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.4M | $265.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.9M | $-153.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.9M | $-46.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $372.8M | $-211.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.8M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.9M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.0M | $70.9M |
| Q4 25 | $171.6M | $-232.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.4M | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.9M | $-157.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.7M | $-50.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $371.3M | $-213.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.4M | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.2M | $-23.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $146.9M | $69.9M |
| Q4 25 | 51.2% | -48.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | -26.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.9% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 125.0% | -114.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.6% | 11.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.60× | 14.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.75× | -24.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.54× | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.32× | -26.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.47× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APAM
Segment breakdown not available.
FLNC
| Products | $450.9M | 95% |
| Services | $22.5M | 5% |
| Digital Applications And Solutions | $1.9M | 0% |
