vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM) and Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($403.4M vs $335.5M, roughly 1.2× Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.). Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. runs the higher net margin — 35.2% vs 2.0%, a 33.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 12.8%). Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($171.6M vs $31.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.7% CAGR vs -3.1%).
Artisan Partners is an American asset management company headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Outside the United States, the company has offices in Dublin, Hong Kong, London, Singapore and Sydney.
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. is an American sports holding company based in New York City.
APAM vs MSGS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $335.5M | $403.4M |
| Net Profit | $118.1M | $8.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 39.2% | 5.5% |
| Net Margin | 35.2% | 2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.9% | 12.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.9% | 641.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.36 | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $335.5M | $403.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.3M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.7M | $204.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.1M | $424.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $297.1M | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $279.6M | $53.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.8M | $227.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $264.4M | $430.0M |
| Q4 25 | $118.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.8M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.6M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.1M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $87.5M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.6M | $25.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.5M | $37.9M |
| Q4 25 | 39.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.8% | -69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | -11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.3% | -15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.0% | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.4% | 18.5% |
| Q4 25 | 35.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | -22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | -3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | -14.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.5% | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | $1.36 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.93 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.94 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.82 | $-0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.99 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.03 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.80 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.84 | $1.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $81.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $190.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $438.8M | $-282.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $81.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $144.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $107.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $89.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $40.0M |
| Q4 25 | $190.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $200.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $438.8M | $-282.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.1M | $-294.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $381.8M | $-281.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.5M | $-283.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.9M | $-273.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $372.1M | $-277.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $341.2M | $-266.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $320.3M | $-294.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.62× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $172.0M | $32.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.6M | $31.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 51.2% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.46× | 3.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $420.6M | $-480.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $172.0M | $32.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.4M | $-85.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.9M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.9M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $372.8M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.8M | $-26.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.9M | $108.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.0M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $171.6M | $31.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.4M | $-85.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.9M | $49.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $371.3M | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.4M | $-26.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.2M | $108.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $146.9M | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | 51.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | -216.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 125.0% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | -49.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.6% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.46× | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.26× | 55.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.32× | 4.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.47× | 0.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APAM
Segment breakdown not available.
MSGS
| Event Related | $167.2M | 41% |
| Media Rights | $122.3M | 30% |
| Sponsorship Signage And Suite Licenses | $98.5M | 24% |
| League Distribution | $15.4M | 4% |
