vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APi Group Corp (APG) and BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APi Group Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.5× BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC). BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC runs the higher net margin — 8.8% vs 4.6%, a 4.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, APi Group Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 6.9%). APi Group Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($356.0M vs $155.2M). Over the past eight quarters, APi Group Corp's revenue compounded faster (15.0% CAGR vs 13.9%).
X.AI Corp., doing business as xAI, is an American company working in the area of artificial intelligence (AI), social media and technology that is a wholly owned subsidiary of American aerospace company SpaceX. Founded by Elon Musk in 2023, the company's flagship products are the generative AI chatbot named Grok and the social media platform X, the latter of which they acquired in March 2025.
Brinker International, Inc. is an American multinational hospitality industry company that owns Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant chains. Founded in 1975 and based in Dallas, Texas, Brinker currently owns, operates, or franchises 1,672 restaurants under the names Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy worldwide.
APG vs EAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $97.0M | $128.5M |
| Gross Margin | 32.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 4.6% | 8.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 6.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.8% | 8.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.16 | $2.86 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $97.0M | $128.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.0M | $99.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.0M | $107.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.0M | $119.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.0M | $118.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $38.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.0M | $57.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.0M | $48.7M |
| Q4 25 | 32.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.16 | $2.86 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $2.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $2.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | $2.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $2.61 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $0.84 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.22 | $1.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.34 | $1.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $912.0M | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.8B | $451.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.4B | $379.3M |
| Total Assets | $8.9B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.81× | 1.19× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $912.0M | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $555.0M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $432.0M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $460.0M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $499.0M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $487.0M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $324.0M | $64.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $247.0M | $15.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $451.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $525.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $426.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $518.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $652.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $806.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $786.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $818.5M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $343.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $370.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $259.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $131.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $39.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $-46.7M |
| Q4 25 | $8.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.81× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | 1.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.87× | 1.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.92× | 2.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.93× | 4.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.96× | 63.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.00× | 19.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.19× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $382.0M | $218.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $356.0M | $155.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.8% | 10.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 4.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.94× | 1.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $663.0M | $455.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $382.0M | $218.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $232.0M | $120.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.0M | $186.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.0M | $212.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $283.0M | $218.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.0M | $62.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.0M | $141.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0M | $130.1M |
| Q4 25 | $356.0M | $155.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.0M | $62.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.0M | $106.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | $132.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $265.0M | $168.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $198.0M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $83.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.0M | $78.7M |
| Q4 25 | 16.8% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.9% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 3.94× | 1.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.49× | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.08× | 1.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.77× | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.22× | 1.84× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.19× | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.59× | 2.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.16× | 2.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APG
Segment breakdown not available.
EAT
| Chilis Restaurants | $1.3B | 91% |
| Maggianos Restaurants | $134.9M | 9% |
| Franchise Revenues | $13.4M | 1% |
