vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APi Group Corp (APG) and Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APi Group Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $247.1M, roughly 8.6× Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.). APi Group Corp runs the higher net margin — 4.6% vs 3.6%, a 1.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, APi Group Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 8.8%). APi Group Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($356.0M vs $30.9M). Over the past eight quarters, APi Group Corp's revenue compounded faster (15.0% CAGR vs 9.6%).
X.AI Corp., doing business as xAI, is an American company working in the area of artificial intelligence (AI), social media and technology that is a wholly owned subsidiary of American aerospace company SpaceX. Founded by Elon Musk in 2023, the company's flagship products are the generative AI chatbot named Grok and the social media platform X, the latter of which they acquired in March 2025.
Information technology (IT) is the study or use of computers, telecommunication systems and other devices to create, process, store, retrieve and transmit information. While the term is commonly used to refer to computers and computer networks, it also encompasses other information distribution technologies such as television and telephones. Information technology is an application of computer science and computer engineering.
APG vs PRTH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $247.1M |
| Net Profit | $97.0M | $8.9M |
| Gross Margin | 32.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 13.6% |
| Net Margin | 4.6% | 3.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.8% | 23.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.16 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $247.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $241.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $239.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $224.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $227.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $219.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $205.7M |
| Q4 25 | $97.0M | $8.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.0M | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.0M | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.0M | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.0M | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.0M | $994.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.0M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 32.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | 13.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.16 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.22 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.34 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $912.0M | $77.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.8B | $1.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.4B | $-100.4M |
| Total Assets | $8.9B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.81× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $912.0M | $77.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $555.0M | $57.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $432.0M | $50.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $460.0M | $47.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $499.0M | $58.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $487.0M | $41.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $324.0M | $34.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $247.0M | $34.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $997.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $917.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $918.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $920.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $808.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $809.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $631.4M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $-100.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $-110.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $-146.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $-158.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $-166.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $-165.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $-172.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $-159.9M |
| Q4 25 | $8.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.19× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $382.0M | $36.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $356.0M | $30.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.8% | 12.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 1.2% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 3.94× | 4.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $663.0M | $75.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $382.0M | $36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $232.0M | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.0M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.0M | $10.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $283.0M | $23.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.0M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.0M | $28.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0M | $13.3M |
| Q4 25 | $356.0M | $30.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.0M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.0M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $265.0M | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $198.0M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.0M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | 16.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.9% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.94× | 4.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.49× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.08× | 1.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.77× | 1.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.22× | 3.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.19× | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.59× | 28.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.16× | 2.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
