vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and Cintas (CTAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $6.4B, roughly 1.2× Cintas). Amphenol runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs 7.8%, a 4.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amphenol posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.4% vs 8.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Cintas's revenue compounded faster (61.2% CAGR vs 45.3%).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
APH vs CTAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $6.4B |
| Net Profit | $943.3M | $502.5M |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | 83.1% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 10.3% |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | 7.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.4% | 8.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | 8.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $1.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | $943.3M | $502.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $495.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $491.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $448.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | $463.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | $448.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | $452.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $414.3M |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | 83.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | 50.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 49.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | 50.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | 49.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | 50.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 22.2% |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 16.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | $1.24 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $1.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | $1.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $1.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $1.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $4.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6B | $183.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.1B | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | $42.1B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | $183.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $200.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $138.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $264.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $243.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $122.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $101.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $342.0M |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $14.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $4.3B |
| Q1 26 | $42.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | $10.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $9.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | $9.2B |
| Q1 26 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | 0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | 0.47× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.3B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 19.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 4.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | 3.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $2.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $531.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $414.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $635.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | $622.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | $441.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | $466.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | $693.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $425.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $312.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $521.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | $522.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | $373.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | $591.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 23.9% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | 3.12× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 1.34× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 1.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions | $4.5B | 60% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions | $1.7B | 22% |
| Interconnect and Sensor Systems | $1.4B | 18% |
CTAS
Segment breakdown not available.
