vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.4B vs $323.3M, roughly 19.9× ECARX Holdings Inc.). Amphenol runs the higher net margin — 18.6% vs -21.4%, a 39.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amphenol posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (49.1% vs 6.5%). Amphenol produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.5B vs $-86.5M).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
APH vs ECX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4B | $323.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.2B | $-69.1M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 15.5% |
| Operating Margin | 26.8% | -20.2% |
| Net Margin | 18.6% | -21.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 49.1% | 6.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 60.2% | 12.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $-0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $323.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $303.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $-69.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $-79.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $548.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | 22.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | -20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | -22.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | -21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | -26.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.4B | $86.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4B | $-293.7M |
| Total Assets | $36.2B | $494.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.09× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $86.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $108.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $-293.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $-198.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $494.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.41× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7B | $-82.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.5B | $-86.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.8% | -26.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.44× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.4B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $-82.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | $-57.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $599.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $-86.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | $-64.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $505.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | -26.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | -21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.09× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions Segment | $3.5B | 54% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions Segment | $1.7B | 26% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $1.4B | 21% |
ECX
Segment breakdown not available.
