vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and Edison International (EIX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $5.2B, roughly 1.5× Edison International). Edison International runs the higher net margin — 35.4% vs 12.4%, a 23.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amphenol posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.4% vs 30.8%). Amphenol produced more free cash flow last quarter ($831.2M vs $-319.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Amphenol's revenue compounded faster (45.3% CAGR vs 13.1%).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
Edison International is a public utility holding company based in Rosemead, California. Its subsidiaries include Southern California Edison, and unregulated non-utility business assets Edison Energy. Edison's roots trace back to Holt & Knupps, a company founded in 1886 as a provider of street lights in Visalia, California.
APH vs EIX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $5.2B |
| Net Profit | $943.3M | $1.8B |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 52.8% |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | 35.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.4% | 30.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | 443.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $4.78 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $4.3B |
| Q1 26 | $943.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $832.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $343.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | $516.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $439.0M |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | 52.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | 56.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 20.8% |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 35.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 37.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 10.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $4.78 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | $2.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $0.89 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $3.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $1.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6B | $158.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.7B | $38.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.1B | $17.6B |
| Total Assets | $42.1B | $94.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.33× | 2.16× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $158.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $364.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $140.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $193.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $200.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $465.0M |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | $38.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | $36.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $37.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $38.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $35.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | $34.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $34.8B |
| Q1 26 | $14.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $17.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $17.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $16.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | $16.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $15.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $15.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | $42.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | $94.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $90.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $88.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | $88.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | $85.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | $84.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | $84.8B |
| Q1 26 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | 2.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | 2.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | 2.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | 2.26× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $831.2M | $-319.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.9% | -6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 36.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | 0.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.6B | $-715.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $882.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | $329.0M |
| Q1 26 | $831.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $-319.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $618.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $-830.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | $-184.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | $-326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | $961.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | $-1.1B |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | -6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | -18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | -4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | -8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | -25.2% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 36.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 32.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | 0.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 2.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 2.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 0.85× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | 3.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 4.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 0.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions | $4.5B | 60% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions | $1.7B | 22% |
| Interconnect and Sensor Systems | $1.4B | 18% |
EIX
| Commercial | $2.2B | 43% |
| Residential | $1.2B | 23% |
| Other | $966.0M | 19% |
| Other Operating Revenue | $802.0M | 15% |
